balancing traditional and contemporary ideals

The region has been the subject of a contentious discussion bangladeshi girls over” Asian values” as a result of Asian countries ‘ economic successes, which are frequently achieved using quite different methods than those of the West. The alleged unity of Eastern economic models, social ideals, and social practices, as well as the responsibility of social factors in East Asia’s emergence as an worldwide power, have been the main topics of discussion in this debate.

An incensed dismissiveness by East Asians has always been a consistent reply to these accusations. The characterizations of their societies that have emerged in the process are never flattering: they are said to be self- reliant, but somehow universalist, centered on individual relationships and joint obligation more than chilly letter of the law–even though the latter is called upon to enforce those values, respectful of hierarchy and authority, and state interventionist, often into the private space of individuals.

This defensiveness is a natural reaction to the fact that the affected societies are experiencing an unprecedented level of change as a result of globalizing forces. The heart of this discussion is, however, the way in which these societies are attempting to create norms of governance and social organization that will be viewed by their citizens.

This is being done at the local level, in public forums, in local government, and in their respective social and religious institutions. In my informal poll of respondents in 1994 and 1996, I think it’s because the majority of Asians place an emphasis on maintaining an organized society, even at the expense of some individual freedoms.